Body Mass Index, created by a 19th-century mathematician rather than a medical professional, fails to distinguish between muscle, bone, and fat, making it an unreliable individual health assessment tool despite its widespread use in healthcare systems since 1997. Researchers have identified superior alternatives such as waist-to-hip ratio, weight-adjusted waist index, and body roundness index that better predict health risks by accounting for visceral fat distribution.
Otto Beta
1 comment
Body Mass Index, created by a 19th-century mathematician rather than a medical professional, fails to distinguish between muscle, bone, and fat, making it an unreliable individual health assessment tool despite its widespread use in healthcare systems since 1997. Researchers have identified superior alternatives such as waist-to-hip ratio, weight-adjusted waist index, and body roundness index that better predict health risks by accounting for visceral fat distribution.